Thing Theory and Ian McEwan’s ‘Solid Geometry’

How would Bill Brown’s Thing Theory apply to a reading of Captain Nicholls’ penis in ‘Solid Geometry’? Would it be possible to argue that this preserved penis is a thing because it is now devoid of ‘function’? Or is it impossible to ever describe a body part, so inscribed with humanity, as a ‘thing’ – a word so associated with the inanimate?

About ejpollard

I was awarded my PhD from Manchester Metropolitan University, UK in December 2013. My thesis explored the notions of origin and ellipsis in the writing of contemporary British novelist Hilary Mantel. I want this blog to express the ideas I have in and around my academic writing. View all posts by ejpollard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: